Legal Opinion

Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Board

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2000No. Nos. 67549-0; 67786-7PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— These two consolidated cases, one of which *73involves four consolidated cases, present numerous issues arising from the Department of Ecology’s denial of applications for groundwater appropriation permits on the basis that the groundwater sources are in hydraulic continuity with surface water sources and further appropriations are foreclosed under the criteria of RCW 90.03.290. In the five individual cases before this court, the Pollution Control Hearings Board upheld Ecology’s denial of the groundwater applications.

We conclude that hydraulic continuity between groundwater and a surface water…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2007

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API