Technical Air Products, Inc. v. Sheridan-Gray, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice:
This matter concerns two prior actions. In the second action, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s claim was barred because it was the subject of a compulsory counterclaim in the former action and was not pleaded. Plaintiff-appellant brings this appeal from the summary judgment..
Appellant is an Arizona corporation operating under the name Technical Air Products, Inc., (Tapco). Appellee, Sheridan-Gray, Inc., is a California corporation. Tapco entered into an agreement with Sheridan-Gray to purchase a Hot…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Albright v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- E. J. Korvette Co. v. Parker Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Biaett v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Berger v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by13 opinions
- John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Carteret Savings & Loan Association, F.A. v. Dr. Neil D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Tarnoff v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- O'BRIEN v. Scottsdale Discount CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Occidental Chemical Co. v. ConnorArizona Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.