Legal Opinion

E. J. Korvette Co. v. Parker Pen Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 23, 1955PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

I am persuaded that the claims alleged by the plaintiffs are compulsory counterclaims which under Rule 13(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., should be asserted in the action previously instituted by the defendant against the plaintiffs.1 In the latter action the plaintiffs (the defendant in this suit, also referred to hereafter as “Parker”) asserts a claim against the defendants (the plaintiffs here) based upon New York’s Fair Trade Law (the Feld-Crawford Act, New York General Business Law, §§ 369-a, 369-b) as authorized by the Miller-Tydings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Columbia Plaza Corporation v. Security National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Union Paving Company v. Downer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Harrington v. Polk County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API