Legal Opinion
Tarnoff v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 11, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1861PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBSON, Judge.
This appeal raises the question of the validity of a default judgment.
Jack C. Jones, plaintiff-appellee, entered into a franchise and lease agreement with Method Master, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Sy B. Gaiber and Joseph Tarnoff, both residents of Illinois. According to the terms of the contract, Method Master, Gaiber, and Tarnoff, agreed to deliver to Jones on or before May 1, 1967, a fully operative eight-bay automotive diagnostic clinic, to provide advertising and sales personnel during the initial stages of the operation, and to spend all sums necessary to train all…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Nielson v. FlashbergArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Edwards Feed Mill, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- In Re: Genesys Data Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Cockerham v. ZikratchArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Meindl v. Genesys Pacific Technologies, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.