Pike v. Clark
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
Plaintiff and appellant seeks by this action to recover a judgment upon a promissory note in the principal sum of $3000.00, dated May 12, 1931, due on or before five years after date, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum. The note contained an acceleration clause providing that the holder may declare the whole sum due for failure to pay interest as it accrued. The note was given for money loaned.
There are allegations seeking to have a mortgage reformed and then foreclosed. It is alleged that a mortgage was intended to be given to secure the payment of the note,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Everett v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Mellon v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Berry v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duncan v. Hemmelwright Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
- Gaddis Investment Company v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Dahl v. CayiasUtah Supreme Court · 1946