Moffet v. Sebastian
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit by A. H. Moffet against John Sebastian for his proportion of a joint promissory note. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
In 1887 the parties to this suit made a joint purchase of stock in a Kansas land company. They raised the money for this investment by giving a joint note for five thousand dollars. Plaintiff claims that he paid this note; and he brings, this suit to recover the amount thereof justly chargeable to-defendant. He obtained a verdict and judgment in the circuit court.
Defendant asks us to reverse that judgment for several reasons:
First. He contends that the tria_ court erred in requiring the jury to state in their verdict tho several items allowed plaintiff; their dates and amounts. (Plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pearl v. Township of BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Collins v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heikkala v. IsaacsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Comstock v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Partridge v. MeekerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Schneider v. TeppertMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Kahn v. MinthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1914