Legal Opinion

Moffet v. Sebastian

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1907No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit by A. H. Moffet against John Sebastian for his proportion of a joint promissory note. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

In 1887 the parties to this suit made a joint purchase of stock in a Kansas land company. They raised the money for this investment by giving a joint note for five thousand dollars. Plaintiff claims that he paid this note; and he brings, this suit to recover the amount thereof justly chargeable to-defendant. He obtained a verdict and judgment in the circuit court.

Defendant asks us to reverse that judgment for several reasons:

First. He contends that the tria_ court erred in requiring the jury to state in their verdict tho several items allowed plaintiff; their dates and amounts. (Plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearl v. Township of BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Collins v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heikkala v. IsaacsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Comstock v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Partridge v. MeekerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Schneider v. TeppertMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kahn v. MinthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API