Comstock v. Taggart
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Assumpsit by Martin D. Comstock against Clark Taggart and others on a promissory note. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, C. J.
This is an action on a promissory note for $600, being one of three notes executed by the 13 defendants for the purchase price of a stallion. The other two notes were for $800 each. The notes were dated August 29, 1904, and were payable, respectively, on October 1, 1906, 1907, and 1908. Defendants pleaded the general issue and gave notice that, prior to and at the time of the sale of the stallion, “ which sale was made by the delivery of said notes to plaintiff on, to wit, September 14, 1904,” at Central Lake, Antrim county, plaintiff’s agent and the plaintiff, in person, warranted that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knop v. National Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Pearl v. Township of BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Culver v. South Haven & Eastern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Moffet v. SebastianMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Christie v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SartoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Vachon v. TodorovichMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Heikkala v. IsaacsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Albajon v. GugliottaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
- Cunningham v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.