Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Minthorn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1914No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Alcona; Connine, J. Garnishment in justice’s court by Joseph J. Kahn against Joshua Minthorn, principal defendant, and Rogers Bros., garnishee defendant. John Sloan intervened as party claimant. From a judgment for the claimant, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff and said intervener brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

Plaintiff, on October 13, 1910, in justice’s court, commenced suit by attachment against the principal defendant, Joshua Minthorn, upon a certain judgment, and summoned Rogers Bros., a corporation, as garnishee defendant, which, on October 20, 1910, disclosed an indebtedness of $157.41 due the principal defendant under a contract made with him for a crop of peas grown, harvested, and delivered by him to such garnishee defendant. On October 31st following, intervener, John Sloan, served a notice on the garnishee defendant, as follows:

“I hereby notify you that by written assignment made on or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnett v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Moffet v. SebastianMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Weeks v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Taylor v. ZiemMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trupiano v. CullyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API