Legal Opinion

Collins v. Beecher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Marquette. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Collins sued the Marquette & Pacific Rolling Mill Company to recover compensation for labor performed for the company in the year 1877. Beecher was made a joint defendant, as being a stockholder. A bill of particulars being called for by Beecher, was given as follows:

The above work performed as common miner in the Rolling Mill Mine.

On the trial the plaintiff gave evidence tending to show that he was employed to labor ■ for the Rolling Mill Co. in 1877; that W. W. Wheaton was treasurer and general manager of the company in that year, and James Bale superintendent under him, and that Bale,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wright v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Hardrick v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API