Legal Opinion

In Re Chaudhary

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2009No. H032794PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

Penal Code section 3000.1 provides that a person convicted of a second degree murder that occurred after January 1, 1983, is subject to lifetime parole and becomes eligible for discharge from parole “when [such a] person . . . has been released on parole from the state prison, and has been on parole continuously for . . . five years.” (Stats. 1982, ch. 1406, § 4, p. 5363.)

Respondent Kailash Chaudhary was convicted of the 1986 second degree murder of his ex-wife and incarcerated in a state prison. He was released on lifetime parole in March 2005. Prior to his release on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Carl D. McQuillion v. William Duncan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. People v. SinohuiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Hylton v. Frank E. Rogozienski, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House VenturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Summit Bank v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. FaiginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API