Legal Opinion
V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 16, 2003No. A108068PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*619KISTLER, J.
Petitioner appeals from an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) designating him as a predatory sex offender. He argues that the board’s order violates various provisions of the state and federal constitutions. We affirm.
Before turning to the facts of this case, we describe briefly the applicable statutory and regulatory background. ORS 181.585(1) provides that a person who has been convicted of a limited class of sex offenses1 will be designated as a “predatory sex offender” if he or she “exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Long v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Long v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003