Legal Opinion
United States v. Price-M
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1963No. 18429PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
320 F.2d 663
UNITED STATES of America, for the Use of E. E. BLACK
LIMITED, a corporation, Appellant,
v.
PRICE-McNEMAR CONSTRUCTION CO., and Seaboard Surety Company,
corporations, Appellees.
No. 18429.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
July 11, 1963.
Robertson, Castle & Anthony, J. Garner Anthony, Arthur B. Reinwald, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.
Samuel Landau, Honolulu, Hawaii, Bryant, Campbell, McCormick & Danielson, John Michael McCormick, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY, HAMLIN and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Charles Benton Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Price-McNemar Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schy v. Susquehanna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- United States ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- DeHart v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- State Highway Commission v. BourneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.