Legal Opinion
United States v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1968No. 12095PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
402 F.2d 893
UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of HUMBLE
OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
The FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, and Frank
Burkholder and Robert Burkholder, Jr.,
Co-partners, doing business as
Burkholder and Burkholder,
General Contractors,
Appellees.
No. 12095.
United States Court of appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 10, 1968.
Decided Sept. 29, 1968.
Lewis F. Powell, Richmond, Va., and J. Sloan Kuykendall, Winchester, Va. (Henry H. Whiting, Winchester, Va., and Jack Spain, Jr., Hunton, Williams, Gay, Powell & Gibson, Richmond, Va., and Kuykendall & Whiting,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Galena Oaks Corporation v. Frank Scofield, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Bergeron v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
- Howard v. West Jersey, C., R.R. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- T v. TSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- City of Bedford v. The James Leffel & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Caviness v. Derand Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Sanchez v. Loffland Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Ellen S. Barry v. Honoria Donnelly, William DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.