State Ex Rel. Wuebker v. Bockrath

We are here presented with a shotgun attack on the Court of Appeals’ decision and judg- . ment.

At one point in the brief of appellant (who was plaintiff below) it is said:

“The original action by appellant, the plaintiff, was based on two principal contentions, first, that the proceedings of the joint township hospital district •board of trustees with reference to the organization of said district and the issuance of bonds were not in conformity with the statutes and were, therefore, unlawful and void and, secondly, that the provisions of General Code Sections 3414-1 et seq., providing for the…