Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Cincinnati v. Flick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1950No. 32094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The determination of the question presented by the demurrer requires this court to construe Section 26, General Code, and determine its applicability to a proceeding for the issuance of bonds, pursuant to Sections 2293-19 to 2293-23, inclusive, General Code.

The particular question presented relates to the amendment of Section 2293-23, General Code, effective October 25, 1949, altering the vote requirement for authority to issue bonds by reducing the vote required for approval from 65 per cent to 55 per cent.

Sections 2293-19 to 2293-23, inclusive, General Code, are a part of the Uniform Bond…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wuebker v. BockrathOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. AchOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Toledo v. WeilerOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schlagheck v. WinterfeldOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Schnoerr v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bohley v. PatryOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. State ex rel. Board of Education v. CrandallOhio Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State ex rel. Speeth v. CarneyOhio Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API