Legal Opinion

Raleigh Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. Tomlinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1970No. 49PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The ordinance here in question was before this Court in Kresge Co. v. Tomlinson, 275 N.C. 1, 165 S.E. 2d 236. We there held that legislative authority for its adoption was conferred upon the City of Raleigh by its charter and by G.S. 160-52 and G.S. 160-200(6), (7), and (10). We also there held, upon the authority of Charles Stores v. Tucker, 263 N.C. 710, 140 S.E. 2d 370, and Clark’s Charlotte, Inc. v. Hunter, 261 N.C. 222, 134 S.E. 2d 364, that the provisions of the ordinance are not unreasonable, arbitrary or discriminatory as applied to the plaintiffs in that action, they being operators…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. SS Kresge Company v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API