Gregory v. Higgins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, County of Mariposa. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
On the 23d of June, 1856, the plaintiff commenced án action upon contract against the defendant, to recover the sum of §952, and sued out a writ of attachment, which the sheriff on the same day served upon one Marshall, with a notice that “ all moneys, goods, credits, effects, and debts due or owing, or any other personal property in his possession, or under his control, belonging” to the defendant, was attached by virtue of the writ.
The garnishee gave to the sheriff a memorandum, in the nature of an answer to the garnishment, (Practice Act, § 129,)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Sheets v. CulverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aigeltinger Co. v. Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Bills v. . National Park Bank of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Clough v. BuckNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Fisher v. O'HanlonNebraska Supreme Court · 1913