Aigeltinger Co. v. Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment for $936.25, interest and costs. Defendant appeals.
The facts in this case are as follows: The defendant, Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company, a. corporation, entered into a contract with the board of public works of the city and county of San Francisco, whereby it agreed to construct the Twin Peaks reservoir. Thereafter the defendant entered into a written contract with the Atlas Construction Company for the performance of the excavation work upon said Twin Peaks reservoir. In said contract it was provided that payments should be made upon the fifteenth day of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burke v. MazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Kelly v. . BloomingdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cunningham Lumber Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Marchant v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Norvell v. CammSupreme Court of Virginia · 1818
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brainard v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Houghton v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Smith v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Steineck v. Haas-Baruch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Philbrook v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.