Legal Opinion

Benson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1992No. 2153 C.D. 1989, 2154 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYER, Judge.

Benson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. (Benson) and Cochran Cadillac, Inc. (Cochran) appeal orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County quashing their appeals from the issuance of a warning letters by the Department of Transportation (DOT). We affirm.

On June 15,1988, DOT issued a warning letter to Benson, an automobile dealer, based upon its findings that Benson had violated section 1103(d) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1103(d). On July 27, 1988, DOT issued a warning letter to Cochran, also an automobile dealer, for a violation of the same statute. Section 1103(d) of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Ridge AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. McGuire v. Department of AgingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. Pacifico Ford, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Ernest Sunday Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. Township of RalphoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. NHS Human Services of PA v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Shaulis v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Shaulis v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API