Legal Opinion
McGuire v. Department of Aging
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 7, 1991No. 425, 426 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*380KELLEY, Judge.
Daniel E. McGuire and Robert Daniel Ainscough (petitioners) appeal from separate orders of the State Civil Service Commission (commission) which denied petitioners’ requests for a hearing based on allegations of discrimination involving the issuance of written reprimands by their employer, the Department of Aging (DOA).1 We affirm.
Petitioner McGuire is a regular status civil service employee who works for DOA as an Aging Services Supervisor. Petitioner Ainscough is a regular status civil service employee who works for DOA as the Director of the Bureau of Program and Field…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guthrie v. Borough of WilkinsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Holt v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ross v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Lehotzky v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DeMarco v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Benson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hebert v. New Orleans Police DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Wydra v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Department of Environmental Resources v. BartalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.