Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shaulis v. Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1999Published

1DissentLeadbetter, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the decision to deny the Commission’s motion to quash. An advisory opinion, even one which has the probable effect of altering future behavior, is not an adjudication within the meaning of the Administrative Agency Law, nor does it present this court with a justiciable appeal.

A fundamental and necessary aspect of any appealable decision is that it be binding. It is a further requirement of an administrative adjudication that it be final. The opinion issued by the Ethics Commission to Ms. Shaulis is neither. A vast difference exists between an opinion that proposed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arsenal Coal Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Wajert v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Suehr v. State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Benson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API