Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pacifico Ford, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1989No. Appeal 2966 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which reversed the suspension of Pacifico Ford’s dealer registration plates and authorization to issue temporary registration plates and cards. We reverse, and reinstate the suspension.

On April 28, 1983, DOT sent a warning letter to Pacifico Ford, concerning a violation of section 1103(d) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §1103(d). This section obligates the dealer to deliver an application for certificate of title to DOT within ten days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ridge AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Ernest Sunday Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. Magarity Chevrolet, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API