Brown v. CONOCOPHILLIPS PIPELINE CO.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Brazil, J.:
This appeal concerns the fate of a large oak tree on the property of Lonzella Brown. The appellant, ConocoPliillips Pipeline Company (Conoco), owns an easement giving it the right to “lay, maintain, operate, inspect and remove” its high-pressure gasoline pipeline which runs through Brown’s property. The pipeline was laid in the 1960s, and since that time the tree has sprung up above the pipeline. In 2009, Conoco sought to cut down the tree on the basis that it interfered with its ability to maintain and inspect the pipeline. Brown eventually obtained a permanent injunction…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Aladdin Petroleum Corporation v. Gold Crown PropertiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Potter v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Haag v. Dry Basement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Moore v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garetson Brothers v. American Warrior, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- Hunter Health Clinic v. Wichita State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- 1400 Museum Park Condominium Ass'n v. Kenny Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Cent. Kan. Conservancy, Inc. v. SidesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
- Carrasco v. Udall, Kansas, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.