Legal Opinion

Rex v. Warner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1958No. 41,103PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The action was one to compel specific performance of an oral contract. Defendants, Ploward C. Warner and Anna Marie Warner, his wife, filed a special demurrer upon the ground that the alleged oral contract sued upon was barred by the statute of limitations, which was overruled by the trial court, and the defendants have appealed.

Pertinent allegations of plaintiff’s amended petition are quoted and summarized as follows: From January 15, 1954, until September 10, 1954, Howard C. Warner was in plaintiff’s employ in El Dorado, and Warner and his…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Foster Lumber Co. v. Harlan County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Assembly of God v. SangsterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Kulp v. KulpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. John Hampton and Dorothy Hampton v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, and Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Friends University v. W. R. Grace & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Crabb v. Swindler, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  5. Price, Administrator v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API