Gilmore v. Hirst
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Miami District Court. Action by J. A. Hirst and J. W. Sponable against E. E. Gilmore and L. C. Gilmore on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring the case here. The case is stated in the opinion herein, filed April 11, 1896.
1Opinion of the Court
*627The opinion of the court was delivered by
Martin, C. J.: On March 18, 1890, The Hancock County Importing Company, of Illinois, sold five stallions to E. E. Gilmore. In the transaction, E. E. Gilmore executed two promissory notes, which were indorsed by his brother, L. C. Gilmore. That on which the original action was brought reads as follows :
“$2,246.50. Paola, Kan., March 18, 1890.
“One year after date, for value received, we promise to pay to Hancock County Importing Company, or order, $2,246.50, payable at the National Bank of Paola, at Paola, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seaton v. ScovillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- South Bend Iron Works v. PaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Killam v. SchoepsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Parker v. PlymellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Lyon v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Clark v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Holliday State Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Lister v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1929