Legal Opinion

Parker v. Plymell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Sumner District Court. Action by Parker, against Plymell and wife, upon two* promissory notes, and a mortgage given as security for their payment. The facts are stated in the opinion. Trial at the* April Term, 1879, of the district court, and judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action on two notes, and for a foreclosure of the mortgage given as security for them. The plaintiff was a bona fide holder for value, before maturity. No* actual notice of any defenses was shown. The notes were negotiable, unless and save as affected by the following matters. The promise was to pay interest at twelve per cent., after maturity; and after this promise were these worlds: “If this note is not paid at maturity, the same shall bear twelve per cent, interest from date.” As a fact, there was usury in the inception of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seaton v. ScovillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Tholen v. DuffySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Clark v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Krutz v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API