Legal Opinion

New York University v. Eckstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 2, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

*162By the terms of the parties’ so-ordered November 1995 stipulation executed in settlement of prior litigation, tenant was issued an initial rent-stabilized lease by petitioner New York University (NYU) “subject to all of the rights, benefits and obligations of rent stabilized tenants under the Rent Stabilization Law and Code” (emphasis added). The parties further agreed that in the event any court or agency thereafter found the apartment premises did not qualify for stabilization coverage, petitioner “cannot refuse to renew [tenant’s] lease except on the grounds of a breach…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharp v. StaviskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Blum v. Graceton Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API