Legal Opinion
437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 15, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.
Since the stipulation was entered into on the record, on the advice of counsel, and in settlement of a bona fide dispute, the “no-waiver” provisions of section 11 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (L 1974, ch 576, § 4) and section 2500.12 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations (9 NYCRR) are not applicable (see Matter of Matinzi v Joy, 60 NY2d 835; Hill v Wek Capital Corp., 4 AD2d 615; Rega v Joy, NYLJ, Aug. 25, 1982, p 11, col 1). Furthermore, the circumstances are not such as to warrant relieving tenant from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matinzi v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hill v. Wek Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blum v. Graceton Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Merwest Realty Corp. v. PragerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997
- Grasso v. MatarazzoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999
- Arkansas Leasing Co. v. GabrielAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- Cashmere Realty Corp. v. New York City Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1985