Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 16, 2020No. 0521/19PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeAngelo Montier Stanley v. State of Maryland, No. 521, Sept. Term 2019. Opinion by Arthur, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE⸺CROSS-EXAMINATION Defendants have the right to cross-examine witnesses about matters relating to their biases, interests, or motives to testify falsely, but this right is not unlimited. In this case, the trial court permitted the defense to elicit testimony that a prosecution witness made numerous allegations against the defendant and others under an expectation of leniency. The court did not abuse its discretion in restricting cross-examination about the details of the witness’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belton & Worsley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Belton & Worsley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Manuel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API