Legal Opinion

Barto Co. v. Aylmore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1923No. 17560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action by The Barto Company, a corporation, on two promissory notes, executed and delivered by the defendant to Barto & Sons Bank, a corporation, which notes were assigned and transferred to the plaintiff. One note is in the sum of $85 and interest, the other one $550 and interest. The statute of limitations was plead as a defense to the action upon each of the notes, and further it was answered that the $85 note had been given to cover an advance of expense money in connection with services to be *395rendered Barto & Sons Bank, and that as to the $550 note it was to be paid by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hoffman v. Gottstein Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Wilson v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Rhodes v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kinnear v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API