Legal Opinion

Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & Nelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1925No. 18616. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

Appellant was the plaintiff below and appeals from a judgment denying it recovery.

The general history of the Hill Syrup Company is sufficiently set forth in Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine Na tional Bank, 128 Wash. 509, 223 Pac. 595; and Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank of Seattle, 129 Wash. 171, 224 Pac. 578, in both of which cases rehearings have been granted, and they are therefore now referred to only for the purpose of avoiding a restatement of the general situation.

In this case appellant sued to recover upon a number of checks signed “Hill Syrup Company, By W. E. Sander, President,”…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. First National Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hanover National Bank v. American Dock & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Fifth National Bank v. Iron City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1899

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nursing Home Building Corp. v. DeHartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Medlinsky v. Premium Cut Beef Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Lake Park Development Co. v. Paul Steenberg Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Goddard's Ltd. v. Bank of Nova ScotiaDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1966
  5. Hemrich v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API