Legal Opinion
Blumhagen v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 15, 1988No. 82-10-196; CA A39129PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
In this unlawful employment practice case, plaintiff argues that defendants violated the Handicapped Persons’ Civil Rights Act by discharging her and failing to reinstate her to her former position as a deputy sheriff or, in the alternative, to another “available and suitable” position after she sustained a compensable on-the-job injury. ORS 659.415; ORS 659.420; ORS 659.425. The trial court found for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. We review de novo, Brown v. City of Portland, 80 Or App 464, 722 P2d 1282, rev den 302 Or 460 (1986), and affirm.
Plaintiff was employed as a deputy sheriff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knapp v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Quinn v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Carney v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Carney v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Brown v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Molloy v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Matos v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Kelley v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Anglin v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Flug v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.