Legal Opinion

Carney v. Guard Publishing Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1980No. 89-2391 CA 15485PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

In this action for back pay for failure to reemploy a worker who sustained a compensable injury, we reversed plaintiffs damage award and remanded on the ground that the trial court erred by failing to give two of defendant’s requested jury instructions. Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., 48 Or App 147, 616 P2d 548 (1980). Plaintiff petitioned for review in the Supreme Court, and under Rule 10.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure, the case is automatically before us on petition for reconsideration.

The facts of the case are fully set out in our former opinion and need not be repeated here. Carney v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carney v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knapp v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Robinson v. School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Blumhagen v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Oregon Bankers Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. OREGON BANKERS v. Bureau of Labor & Ind.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API