Legal Opinion

Flug v. University of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 1, 2000No. 16-96-04247; CA A99397PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for unlawful employment practices and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Plaintiff claimed that defendant violated ORS 659.425 by

“discriminating against Plaintiff in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment * * * because she has a mental impairment which, with reasonable accommodation by the employer, would not prevent the performance of work for Defendant; and/or because Plaintiff has a record of such impairment; and/or because Defendant regards Plaintiff as having a mental impairment.”1

Plaintiff also claimed that defendant retaliated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flug v. University of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Travis v. KnappenbergerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  3. Angela Matheney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  4. Camarata v. Portland Community CollegeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  5. Cannon v. Polk County District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API