Tryon v. Sutton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Sixth District. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Terry, C. J. concurring.
1. It is conceded by the counsel for the Respondent that there is an error in the decree in this case by an omission to give credit for one thousand dollars entered on the note. This seems to have been a clerical error, which the pleadings themselves disclose, and the Respondent is willing that it should be corrected here. As no motion was made for the correction in the Court below, the error would be corrected here at the cost of the Appellants, and the decree otherwise affirmed, if there were no other error in the record.
2. There seems to be another error in the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Kindel v. Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Smedberg v. BevilockwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.