ZELINSKY Et Ux. v. Chimics
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
These are appeals from final judgment in favor of the appellants which was entered after appellants’ motion for new trial limited only to the question of damages, or in the alternative, a new trial, was overruled.
Appellants, Walter Zelinsky and his wife, Ann Zelinsky, instituted an action in trespass against George Chimics, Sr. for personal injuries and property damage to the husband’s automobile. The action arose out of a collision between the husband’s automobile and an automobile owned and operated by appellee. On the appellee’s motion the plaintiff-husband was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ewing v. Pittsb. C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Bosley v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Potere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Hess v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dawes v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Hunsley v. GiardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Rickey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Robb v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Petition of the United States of America as Owner of the United States Coast Guard Vessel Cg-95321, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability. United States of America, David J. Grant, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.