Legal Opinion

Bosley v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1958No. Appeals, 70. and 71PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Defendant’s cattle strayed on to plaintiffs’ farm and injured their crops, for which the jury gave plaintiffs a verdict of $179.99. Mrs. Mary Louise Bosley, the wife-plaintiff, sought to recover damages for a heart disability which resulted from her fright and shock upon being chased by a Hereford bull owned by defendant. The bull did not strike or touch plaintiff, and plaintiff suffered no physical injury. The Superior Court sustained the entry of a nonsuit. Considering the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the facts may be thus summarized.

On April…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ewing v. Pittsb. C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Potere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Huston v. Freemansburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Hess v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Corso v. MerrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API