Legal Opinion

Robb v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 28, 1965No. 97PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

The question before us for decision is this: May the plaintiff recover for the physical consequences of fright caused by the negligence of the defendant, the plaintiff being within the immediate zone of physical danger created by such negligence, although there was no contemporaneous bodily impact?

Considering the record in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the facts may be thus summarized:

A private lane leading to the home of the plaintiff, Dixie B. Robb, was intersected by a railroad right-of-way leased to the defendant, The Pennsylvania Railroad Company. On March…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Battalla v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API