Legal Opinion

Potere v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeals, 161 and 166PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

The plaintiff, Nicholas Potere, instituted this action in trespass against the City of Philadelphia to recover for personal injuries sustained by reason of the collapse of a street upon which he was driving. The original defendant joined Oxford Construction Company, Inc., with whom it had contracted for the construction of a storm water relief sewer, as an additional defendant. The additional defendant in turn brought upon the record as second additional defendant, Curly Construction Company, Inc., to whom it had subcontracted the tunneling work for the sewer.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Hess v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Mars v. Meadville Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Linn v. Duquesne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Vereb v. MarkowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Bosley v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Long v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Murphy v. Penn Fruit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API