Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Kiggins

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1977No. 10089, 10351 and 10546PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment on cross-motions for that relief. The unverified complaint alleged that certain fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions attributable to appellees were made to appellants in connection with the latters’ purchases of undivided interests in joint ventures. These ventures, known as Series 1 and Series 5, were organized for the exploration and production of oil and gas by the Hanover Planning Company, Inc. (Hanover) a wholly owned subsidiary of Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes (Hornblower). We affirm the grant of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. International Underwriters, Inc. v. BoyleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API