United States Ex Rel. Pedicone v. Mazak Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BECKWITH, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court at an oral hearing on October 7, 1992 for the resolution of two issues.
This action was brought by qui tam Plaintiff, Alfred J. Pedicone, pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. While this matter has had a complex factual history, for purposes of the resolution of the two issues before the Court only a few facts are relevant. The Attorney General neither intervened in this False Claims Act action nor notified the Court of a decision not to intervene, as required by 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4)(A) and (B). The qui tam…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Minotti v. LensinkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States ex rel. Laughlin v. EicherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944
- United States, Ex Rel. Burch v. Piqua Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Burr v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Johnson-Pochardt v. Rapid City Regional HospitalDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2003
- Searcy v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States ex rel. Smith v. LampersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.