Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Smith v. Lampers

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2003No. 02-3095PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises the issue of whether the government’s consent is required before a private plaintiff (called a “relator”) may voluntarily dismiss a qui tam action under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1). The district court, over the government’s objection, dismissed with prejudice this FCA qui tam action based upon the relator’s and the defendant’s consent to the dismissal. Because the district court’s judgment is contrary to both the plain language of the FCA and controlling Sixth Circuit authority, we vacate the judgment and remand the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Health Possibilities, P.S.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Searcy v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States Ex Rel. Pedicone v. Mazak Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Summers v. LHC Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States ex rel. Shea v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Michael AngeloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Shea v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. AngeloDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API