United States, Ex Rel. Burch v. Piqua Engineering, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s motion to dismiss (doc. 19), the memorandum of amicus curiae United States Senate in support of the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (doc. 22), the Plaintiffs’ response (doc. 23), and the Defendant’s reply (doc. 25). 1
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Barbara K. Burch, Joan R. Harmon, and Bell A. Kissinger were employed by Defendant Piqua Engineering, Inc. (“Piqua” or the “Company”) in Piqua, Ohio. Piqua is a government- contractor which manufactures missile detonators. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carol Rae Cooper Foulds v. Texas Tech UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. NEC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson v. Northrop Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Grand Ex Rel. United States v. Northrop Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Butler v. Magellan Health Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.