Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 30, 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TODD, Presiding Judge,

Middle Section.

The plaintiff, Angelia Nicholson Duncan, has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court which granted her an absolute divorce and alimony in solido, but no periodic alimony or attorneys fees.

As issues, appellant cites seven alleged errors of the Trial Judge as follows:

1. Failing to find defendant guilty of adultery.

2. Failing to properly analyze the assets of the parties....

3. Failing to award punitive alimony.

4. Failing to award alimony in futuro.

5. Failing to award more alimony in sol-ido.

6. Failing to award attorneys fees.

7. Granting to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Toncray v. ToncrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Schoen v. J.C. Bradford & Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  3. Williams v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Zang v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alumax Aluminum Corp., Magnolia Division v. Armstrong Ceiling Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  2. Wilder v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. Al-Haddad v. Al-HaddadCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Hopkins v. HopkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Luna v. LunaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API