Legal Opinion

Alumax Aluminum Corp., Magnolia Division v. Armstrong Ceiling Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 23, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TODD, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, Armstrong Ceiling Systems, Inc., has appealed from a non-jury judgment of $40,104.54 in favor of plaintiff, Alumax Aluminum Corporation for ceiling materials manufactured and delivered to defendant.

On May 30, 1984, plaintiff contracted to manufacture and deliver to defendant ceiling materials for installation in the Capitol Hill Office Building in Nashville, Tennessee. Sometime after delivery and acceptance of the materials, it was found that they were not of the correct dimensions, and the parties agreed that plaintiff “pick up” the materials and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Capital City Bank v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Campbell County Board of Education v. Brownlee-Kesterson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. Addis v. Bernardin, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Duncan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  5. Royal Insurance Co. v. Alliance Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harlan v. HardawayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. Autozone, Inc. v. Glidden Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  3. Landry v. DoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  4. Dan Stern Homes, Inc. v. Designer Floors & Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  5. H.W. Jenkins Co. v. G.T. DesignsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API