Paterson v. Condos
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
COLEMAN, J.:
This is an action upon the quantum meruit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, in which materialmen and subcontractors joined. The defendant filed an answer in which he denied certain allegations of the complaint and pleaded affirmatively that an express contract was entered into to erect the building in question for the sum of $38,800, pursuant to certain plans and specifications. In his reply the plaintiff denied this affirmative allegation. The court entered its formal findings, wherein it found that the parties originally entered into the express contract…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
- Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Rowland v. LepireNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- El Ranco, Inc. v. First National Bank of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- California Commercial Enterprises v. Amedeo Vegas I, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.