Pacific Finance Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Motion by defendant, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint as failing to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The facts are these:
*799Plaintiff obtained a writ of seizure and pursuant thereto took from the possession of one Daniel Weil a certain automobile which it claimed it owned. Pursuant to section 63 of the Municipal Court Code, Weil, claiming ownership, gave the undertaking or bond of the defendant, now sued on, to regain possession of the seized chattel.
The condition of the bond is that Weil will establish ownership of the property…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goodwin v. . BunzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Graf v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Shannon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- Cohen v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Santini Fertilizer Co. v. Roldán VelázquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
- Santini Fertilizer Co. v. Roldán VelázquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936