Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. McKean

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1922No. 3911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The question here presented is whether under the laws of Oregon, which provide that, in a case where attached property has been released by virtue of a forthcoming bond, the court, upon giving judgment against the defendant, “shall also give judgment in like manner and with like effect” against the sureties, the remedy so provided is exclusive, so that the failure thus to enter- judgment against the sureties discharges them from the obligation of their undertaking. In 6 C. J. p. 351, § 741, is expressed the rule to which we find no exception among reported…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trent v. RhombergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Bremer & Co. v. Fleckenstein & MayerOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bunneman & Martononi v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Smith v. DwightOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Brady v. OnffroyWashington Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santini Fertilizer Co. v. Roldán VelázquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
  2. Santini Fertilizer Co. v. Roldán VelázquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API