Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 17, 1967No. Civ. 46271PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE B. HARRIS, Chief Judge.
This private treble damage suit initiated by five Northern California “Chicken Delight” franchisees on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated throughout the United States is before this court on cross-motions filed pursuant to the provisions of Fed.R. Civ.P. 23, that is, on the part of defendants, that the representational allegations contained in the complaint be stricken, and on the part of the plaintiffs, that the action be allowed to continue as a class action.
The complaint is framed within two causes of action. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Kronenberg v. Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.