Legal Opinion

Ulmanis v. Ulmanis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2000No. 23014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Presiding Judge.

Eugene Ulmanis asked the trial court to terminate his obligation to pay maintenance to his ex-wife, Holly Ulmanis, and to reduce the child support he must pay her.

The trial court denied the first request but granted the second.

Eugene1 appeals, maintaining the trial court wrongly denied the first request and should have granted a greater reduction in child support.

The parties’ marriage was dissolved November 22,1996.

Eight days earlier, on November 14, 1996, the parties signed a separation agreement (“the Agreement”). Part IV of the Agreement reads:

“The parties agree,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anglim v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Prueliage v. De Seaton CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Curtis v. TozerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Settles v. SettlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. HammonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Central Parking System of Missouri, LLC v. Tucker Parking Holdings, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Ankrom v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Estate of L.G.T. v. N.R.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Murphy v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API